| |
 |
| |
|
|
|
Trustee
Joined: 02 Dec 2007
Posts: 2
|
 Posted: Thu Apr 10, 2008 4:28 pm Post subject: Would this converstation on the Purdue Cytometry mail list b |
 |
|
|
Re: advertisingFrom: Alice L. Givan (Alice.L.Gi...@dartmouth.edu)Date: Wed Nov 06 2002 - 14:38:54 EST* Next message: Amy Raber: "degranulation-another question!"* Previous message: Robert Keefe: "Y. pestis"* Maybe in reply to: Alice L. Givan: "Re: advertising"* Next in thread: Robb Habbersett: "Re: advertising"* Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ][ author ][ attachment ]________________________________________I need to add that I was NOT suggesting that this network give anyspecial dispensationto Dick Haugland and Molecular Probes. They, like many othercompanies, are ofgreat benefit to the flow community. I was suggesting that we be abit relaxed inour willingness to accept subtle advertising in general --- becausewe can benefitfrom being able to get advice directly from people who are at theforefront of flowdevelopment. Obviously, knowing where to draw the line can bedifficult.....AliceAlice L. GivanEnglert Cell Analysis Laboratoryof the Norris Cotton Cancer CenterDartmouth Medical SchoolLebanon, New Hampshire NH 03756tel 603-650-7661fax 603-650-6130gi...@dartmouth.edu________________________________________* Next message: Amy Raber: "degranulation-another question!"* Previous message: Robert Keefe: "Y. pestis"* Maybe in reply to: Alice L. Givan: "Re: advertising"* Next in thread: Robb Habbersett: "Re: advertising"* Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ][ author ][ attachment ]________________________________________This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.6 : Thu Jan 01 2004 -17:42:08 ESTRe: advertisingFrom: Robb Habbersett (r...@lanl.gov)Date: Wed Nov 06 2002 - 14:19:13 EST* Next message: Richard Haugland: "Re: rat blood eosinophils"* Previous message: Amy Raber: "degranulation-anotherquestion!"* In reply to: Alice L. Givan: "Re: advertising"* Next in thread: Marty Bigos: "Re: advertising"* Reply: Marty Bigos: "Re: advertising"* Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ][ author ][ attachment ]________________________________________Once again Alice is ... RIGHT ON!!RobbAt 05:52 PM 11/5/2002 -0500, Alice L. Givan wrote:- Hide quoted text -- Show quoted text -- Hide quoted text -- Show quoted text ->I would not like for Dick Haugland to feel that we are criticizing his>participation in>this list. Molecular Probes has been a HUGE help to all flow and imaging>cytometrists.>Advice from that company has been good, generous, dependable, and without>strings.>The new MP handbook is a fantastic source of information. I would hope>that advice>from Dick will continue to be submitted to the whole network --- and if he>gets a bit>of free advertising from it, then he deserves it.>Alice>Alice L. Givan>Englert Cell Analysis Laboratory>of the Norris Cotton Cancer Center>Dartmouth Medical School>Lebanon, New Hampshire NH 03756>tel 603-650-7661>fax 603-650-6130>gi...@dartmouth.eduRobert C. HabbersettTechnical Staff MemberLos Alamos National LaboratoryMS-M888 BN2Los Alamos, NM 87545phone 505.667.0296fax 505.665.3024"As often happens in science, the paradox was resolved as soon as theobvious was abandoned in the face of experimental evidence."{from a recent review in Science}________________________________________* Next message: Richard Haugland: "Re: rat blood eosinophils"* Previous message: Amy Raber: "degranulation-anotherquestion!"* In reply to: Alice L. Givan: "Re: advertising"* Next in thread: Marty Bigos: "Re: advertising"* Reply: Marty Bigos: "Re: advertising"* Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ][ author ][ attachment ]________________________________________This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.6 : Thu Jan 01 2004 -17:42:09 ESTBEWARE OF DELTA T CELL TREATMENThttp://www.suriyampalayam.california-divorcd-lawyer.info/delta-cells#Re: EMAIL ABUSE - how to stopFrom: Adam Treister (a...@treestar.com)Date: Mon Dec 16 2002 - 16:00:07 ESTNext message: PAUL HALLBERG: "Summary: Sorting CHO cells"Previous message: Mojgan Shaiegan: "RBC phenotyping by flow"In reply to: J.Paul Robinson: "EMAIL ABUSE - how to stop"Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ][ attachment ]---------------------------------------------------------------------------¬-----On Thursday, December 12, 2002, at 05:43 AM, J.Paul Robinson wrote:> Colleagues: I am sending out a copy of a message I have just sent to> RNWAY laboratories of South Korea and all 20 worldwide distributors of> RNWAY products most of whom are highly reputable companies. I am only> sending it to you because I am going to propose to create a small>"SCIENTISTS against EMAIL ABUSE" type of revolutionary action.........Paul,Sounds like you're advocating fighting disease by eradicating theantigen instead of boosting the immune response. You can organizeallyou want on eliminating the pest, but until they put a stamp tax onemail, a better approach is to let themessages be out there, but have them filtered to oblivion before youever see them.In your case, the postmaster at Purdue is probably already filteringmillions of messages a day that come to the thousands of email usersoncampus. They are probably capable of shutting down any RNWAY mail,andspreading the word to other postmasters that they also should filterthose messages.So if you can get the IT people at the university to tighten theirsieve, that's best. Otherwise you have to switch to an email programthat has good junk filters. I think I get 500+ messages a day, andonly 10 to 20 make it past the junk filter.Until last summer I was using Outlook Express and spam was a hugeproblem. Since then I switched to the free Mail program in OS X,whichjust added special features for spam detection and removal. Itsprobably 97% effective, and I haven't found any false positives.So, of course, the best answer is to get a Mac  I'm sure the PC mail clients are addressing this issue as well. Ibelieve there are central databases of offenders so programs canlearnfrom others which messages to delete. I would imagine this is themost important feature in any email program sold these days, so I betEudora or other third party mail programs have this solved.There's a lot of information on the subject at:http://spam.abuse.net/Whether you fight the problem on the server or the client, itdefinitely is worth getting it cleaned up. I found it screwed up mywhole communications process because every time I wanted check email,Ihad to wade through dozens or hundreds of useless ads.Adam---------------------------------------------------Adam Treistera...@treestar.comwww.flowjo.com 800-366-6045------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------¬-----Next message: PAUL HALLBERG: "Summary: Sorting CHO cells"Previous message: Mojgan Shaiegan: "RBC phenotyping by flow"In reply to: J.Paul Robinson: "EMAIL ABUSE - how to stop"Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ][ attachment ]---------------------------------------------------------------------------¬-----This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.6 : Thu Jan 01 2004 -17:42:13 ESTNever tried to get hired of fired but just tried to introduce software to Purdue and got called SCAMMERS for no reason. You want to see discrimination here is one for you!This is a preferred software companyFlowJo hiring, come see us at ISACThis message: [ Message body ] [ More options ]Related messages: [ Next message ] [ Previous message ]From: Adam Treister Date: Sun May 14 2006 - 20:04:57 EDTCome join the FlowJo team!***********************************************************************************************************************If you're not coming to ISAC, you must not be cool, and we don'twantto hire you.****************************************************************************************************************************If you're not coming to ISAC, you must not be cool, and we don'twantto hire you.***************************************************************************************************************************If you're not coming to ISAC, you must not be cool, and we don'twantto hire you.***************************************************************************I never applied for that job either.I nothing to do with this group..only want a free market!To allow one company to give information over others and make a exception for personal gain is a form of discrimination towards other that would like to provide information about thier products.I NEVER HACKED into anyones system this was open information on the internet I discovered after being called a SCAMMERSo do you believe this is fair treatment to others in the world?This is a INTERNATIONAL ORG. ISAC..AND CYTOMETRY.THEY ARE MAKE PROGRESS WITH SMALL COMPANIES NOT CALL THEM SCAMMERS AND I CAN SHOW YOU ALL THE "ADVERTISEMENT THEY HAVE WHICH IS JOKED ABOUT AS THEY BLOCK EVERYONE ELSE..I IS NOT SUPOSE TO BE THE GOOD OLD BOYS NETWORKWhy don't you googlePurdue Cytometry Mail List You will see for your self. Guess it does not have anything to do with your life.Our products have been launched through bestbuy,circuitcity,cnet,simtel,officemax, and many other retailers but what about the companies.what if you developed software..They are linked to ever university and hospital in the world.So what if you were called a SCAMMER..BY THE PRESIDENT OF THE WORLD?IT IS THE INTERNATIONAL SOCIETY OF ANALYITAL SOCIETY OF CYTOLOGY...Joking about small companies and blocking and filtering the mail is not proper.NO WE DID NOT POST ON THIER LIST. BUT FOR THEM TO CALL OUR CORPORATION SCAMMERS SENDING JUNK MAIL IS LIABLE. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
|
 |
Tiepeaway
Joined: 16 Nov 2007
Posts: 3
Location: Netherlands
|
| Posted: Fri Apr 11, 2008 3:16 am Post subject: Would this converstation on the Purdue Cytometry mail list b |
|
|
|
| I don't think so. It sounds like they were disputing whether a participant's posts were over the line -- more advertisement than participation -- and seemed to agree that they weren't. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
turner2326
Joined: 22 Nov 2007
Posts: 4
|
| Posted: Fri Apr 11, 2008 2:04 pm Post subject: Would this converstation on the Purdue Cytometry mail list b |
|
|
|
| Okay. Near as I can tell, you think you are being discriminated against in the hiring process at Purdue Cytometry. You are posting numerous questions containing a jumble of copy pulled from numerous sources without giving us any reference as to where they can come and how each part relates to any other part.The result is incomprehensible.If you have not been hired, or you have been fired, please consider that it may be due to your complete inability to express yourself in a way that can be understood. That is not illegal discrimination.EDIT - what you appear to want is the right to access a private member mailing list to sell your own software. You don't have that right. And you certainly don't have the right to hack into the Purdue system in search of hidden code that will give you access to their mailing list after you have been denied. You appear to be breaking the law and posting proof of your crimes all over Yahoo Answers. It might be a good time to quit while you are ahead. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
|
|
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum
|
|
| |
FAQ
Search
Usergroups
Register
Profile
Log in to check your private messages
Log in
